|
EXECUTIVE ANGST
– COMPENSATION NEGOTIATIONS – PART TWO
“If you are
the final candidate working with an executive search
firm, negotiation of the compensation package is often
easier as they act as the buffer and objective third
party in facilitating this process.”
Part Two - The
second thing to remember is always wait for the hiring
company to open up the discussion related to compensation.
Dialog concerning expectations and compensation for
executive positions should be out-lined as early on
in the process as possible, with both sides putting
'must-haves' on the table once a mutual interest has
been determined. This can sometimes occur during the
initial meeting - so be prepared. We know that traditional
hiring practices discourage such discussions until
well into the process, but each side enters the hiring
process with certain expectations and desirables,
and the sooner the company and the candidate reveal
these, the better for both parties. In other words,
some items are fixed and some items are moveable.
Successful negotiation depends on discerning between
the two, then focusing on how to structure the flexible
areas in a way that achieves balance between the fixed.
Keep in mind that every win-win negotiation is achieved
when both parties understand that each must give a
little in order to receive a little - and give a lot
if they expect to receive the same in return.
Remember, $350,000 or
comp package can come in many different forms—base
salary, bonus, stock options, car allowance, and a
number of other creative ways to reach that "magic
number," whatever it may be.
Putting everything on
the table as early on in the process is extremely
important. If the candidate was underpaid at his or
her previous job, for example, it benefits them to
address that up front—backed
by facts and figures—before
the hiring company or search firm verifies the candidate's
previous salary. Work from the assumption that everything
will be verified. Unexpected discoveries almost always
set negotiations back and are often "show stoppers."
It takes a certain amount of confidence and diplomacy
to enter salary negotiations early in the hiring process;
this comes from doing your homework. However, it is
wise if the candidate not introduce the issue of money
first, but wait for the company to do so. Otherwise
the candidate runs the risk of either "low-balling"
or overpricing themselves - and in every case, turning
the hiring company off before establishing your value
in the company's mind. Do not expect that a strong
interview will drive up your value if you are currently
earning far beyond the company's stated compensation
range.
Oftentimes, too, a candidate believes the new company
should make up for a short-fall in how they should
be compensated in their potential new role if their
current package is far below the going market rate.
But demands, presumed value, or desire to reap a six
or seven figure salary mean little without the information
and more importantly the ability to back it up. Or,
from the other side of the table, the dream of bringing
in top candidates for industry-average compensation
packages rarely solidify in reality unless the company
provides additional incentive, either in the form
of a strong bonus or growth potential, and usually
both.
If everyone involved
in the process does their job—gathering
supporting data, providing and verifying information,
discerning wants from needs, and so on—there
should not be any surprises at the end of the negotiation.
With a little bit of preparation, coupled with open
and honest communications, both parties should be
able to reach a good solid agreement.
|